All this recent bet-hedging in the publishing arena makes me want to get dangerous with my literature. It makes me want to read and write books that only the most fearless editor would ever dare to publish, and only the most uncompromising writer would ever endeavor–at the risk of starving their family– to write. Whether you’re talking about narrative decisions or acquisitions, nothing is worse for literature than safe choices. The closer you get to the sure-thing, the bigger turd you’re bound to unleash on the world. And I fully expect a steady diet of turds from the big houses in the coming years unless they decide to get dangerous (and I don’t mean fiscally irresponsible). Thus, I begin my tenure as the fourth of ‘three guys’ with a challenge to corporate publishers: bring me something dangerous. Bring me something that demands to be read. Send me a galley that will insinuate itself to the top of my impossible pile not because of a marketing push, or a big print run, but because the writing is viral and the word-of-mouth cannot be stopped. Then I’ll have my intern read it.
Related posts:
- Welcoming Jonathan Evison to the Three Guys Blog It’s exceptional to encounter a personality so strong, so open to new ideas that you become friends, even though that friend lives 3,000 miles away and you have never met...
- Jonathan Evison interviews David Liss JE: I should have made this post a month ago, upon the release of David Liss’s new book, “The Devil’s Company,”(about which the Washington Post raves), but alas, I’ve been...
- Jonathan Evison Interview Dennis Haritou: Jonathan generously took the time to answer some questions. The Three Guys seem to be developing a format where we do a close discussion of the text, an...
- When We Fell in Love – Jonathan Evison JC: Johnny needs no introduction around here. All About Lulu was one of the first novels 3G1B covered, and JE became one of the earliest friends of the blog, eventually...
- Rollie vs. Them by Jonathan Evison Jason Chambers: As promised more than a week ago, here is Jonathan Evison’s previously unpublished short story Rollie vs. Them. I’ll save any commentary for afterwards, and just let you...
When We Fell In Love - Jonathan Santlofer
When We Fell In Love - John McNally
When We Fell In Love - Tom Rachman
When We Fell In Love - Roger Smith
When We Fell In Love - Simon Rich
When We Fell In Love: David Zweig
When We Fell In Love - Hesh Kestin
When We Fell In Love - D.R. Haney
Uh, your challenge sounds… radical. Might scare the bean-counters. And besides, I thought that was what small presses were for: to publish literature that takes risks. No, to just publish literature. Am I wrong here? Peace, Linda
. . . scaring bean counters sounds like a lot of fun! . . .
The irony is that there’s money to be made, doing what you propose.
Beans are soooo last century. I agree with you J-man, time to step it up a notch and break from the mold. The big houses that do this will set the direction and pace for the field as we come out of this slump. The ones who take up your challenge will reap great rewards . . . and so will the readers!
. . . ricardo should know, since he just led soft skull to their best year ever–in the worst possible climate! . . . harper collins should offer him his own imprint . . .
. . . agreed on all counts, josie!
now I envision a stage dive right into the suits, and wanting it to be a variable of a punk show at the Key Arena. I’d love to see it in other words!
. . . i hope you’re there to catch me, double-h!
Can’t wait to read your first review.
I look forward to a literature rebellion. Web 2.0 is dismantling the old school hold on what writing is literature, and what literature gets distributed. The publishers that are taking risks are the ones that deserve to survive.
. . . yes, i’ll be interested to see if any of the big houses send us something dangerous!
. . . and aaron, i agree, the risk-takers are the ones who will survive!
After you save publishing, I’d like you to move on to music, newspapers, micro-breweries and baseball. Not necessarily in that order.
. . .ha! well, knowing me, jimbo, i think you can guess the order!
I’m not much of a publishing expert so I’ll say let’s save beer.
Congrats on your Westcoast blogging POV.
BUNNIES
. . . yes, beer– i’m already saving it (when i’m not drinking my stores) . . .
there’s been so much …dreary… and a sense of doom in the publishing world b/c big houses are laying off and everyone’s worried.
i like your challenge. there has been too much safety…too much ‘what if i offend _____?’ …too much six and seven figure advances to intense mediocrity.
as writers we have to keep up with what’s going on in the publishing industry…and it’s also our responsibility to redefine it.
then again, health insurance is good to have and my teeth are rotting out of my head.
. . . traditionally, it seems to me that the writer was the once informing the zeitgeist and determining what was of social relevance . . .somewhere along the line the marketing folks took over . . . and don’t get me wrong, i have a lot of respect for good marketers . . .but they strike me as ‘how’ people more than ‘what’ people . . . btw, congrats on the book offer, tony!
I like your challenge! I wrote a book that is a mix of poetry, prose and nonfiction with a strong story line.
I have had the honor of meeting many editors who all tell me the same thing without even reading the script: a book that you can not place on one shelf, (two max,) at Barnes and Nobles will not get published… sad case of oligarchy, a small number of companies own everything in the world: from books to laundry detergent.
. . . hmmm, seems to me that moby dick had a number of narrative elements (poetry, essay, fiction)– and that one's probably in a few b&n's!
That was Moby Dick in Moby Dick’s time. You heard of the casablanca project? The script Casablanca submitted now gets rejected left and right… it is actually really funny. or about Jane Austen’s work getting rejected or the booker prize winners of the 70′s resubmitting now, and their sordid tale
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/4651/
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoaxipedia/Casablanca_Rejected/
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/publishers_reject_booker_prize_winners/
Regardless, I hope you are right and the information I received is wrong. Optimism, perseverance and talent are everything in writing.
. . .yes, i remember hearing how the great gatsby was rejected twenty-odd times, once by the publisher who was already slated to publish it . . .one editor is purported to have told fitz something along lines of: get rid of that gatsby character, and you might have something . . . also heard about the grapes of wrath being submitted to a bunch of houses some years back and getting universally rejected . . .my question: how the fuck did any of those editors not recognize the grapes of wrath? i mean, even if you hadn’t read it, at some point aren’t you going: hmmm, dustbowl, okies, joad family, why does this sound so familiar?