When We Fell In Love – Kyle Beachy

DH: Kyle Beachy’s heartland debut, the coming-of-age novel The Slide, was published by the hyper-selective Dial Press in January of 2009. The Slide takes place in St. Louis and I joined a St. Louis Cardinals fan club while I was reading that book. I’m not even a baseball fan. But I was carried away by The Slide’s uplifting regionalism.

Right now, Kyle is gearing up to teach a course in David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest. I was able to catch up with KB between semesters and he provided the Guys with the knockout post below. Reading Kyle’s post made me wish I could audit his class.

When We Fell in Love by Kyle Beachy

My first reading of White Noise took place outdoors, in a reclining deck chair with my feet up against the log railing outside of a friend’s parent’s log home built onto a mountainside in Summit County, state of Colorado. I mention this for two reasons. First, to clarify that I was then, as I had been all of my life, plugged neatly into a world of American wealth and wasteful consumption, which made the big red DeLillo target on my back all the bigger and redder. I had also just finished college, and so (second reason) having the freedom to read this way and not have to think in terms of analysis was weird for me and sort of uncomfortable. Halfway through I realized I was underlining and writing marginalia, though I didn’t know why. It was also, incidentally, the first week of September, 2001. (If the date matters, which it might, it matters in such a nuanced and personal way I probably shouldn’t even begin.)

I can’t recall where I was when I first read Haruki Murakami’s Norwegian Wood. I do know that when I tried to read it a second time it did not take, and so I was for certain in Chicago, where trains rattle overhead and the wind carries knives and winter comes like a trade embargo, fully-armed with tanks and warships; a city, God bless it, that is frankly no place for a love story. The only reason I went looking for this most famous of the early Murakamis was because I’d read Hardboiled Wonderland and the End of the World as an undergraduate and fallen deeply for the novel’s quiet take on apocalypse. It is a mad scientist and his fat daughter in pink, Inklings crawling through dark tunnels beneath Tokyo, and a protagonist (who is two protagonists, actually) caught between two warring systems (that are one system, actually). Plus also unicorns that do just fine without rainbows, which good luck finding too many of those.

I bought my copy of Denis Johnson’s The Name of the World from one of the grumpy, ageless men who unfold their tables of books on Bedford Avenue, in Williamsburg, and then stand towering over them while avoiding eye contact and seeming just outrageously put out when you ask how much one of the books costs. It is a hardback first edition of a book I had read in paperback years earlier while traveling, and then left on some bus somewhere and forgotten almost completely about except for one line that stayed with me, and which was the sole reason I handed the man four of my dollars even though he was a big fat asshole and my luggage was already full and I was running late for meeting a journalist, and was nervous because he (the journalist) was going to interview me about writing, and “struggles” and I had never really been interviewed before, and I was scared. It really is an amazing line, subtle and easily grazed over but surely the sort for which we should all bow to Johnson, one which equates the farthest limits of human emotion with our smallest efforts of mere existence.

The flight home from New York gave me time to read in search of that line. I didn’t find it until page 87, and by that point I had decided that the younger me had gotten the book all kinds of wrong, and wrong in the way that only the older, aspiring writer me could diagnose. Because, though bizarre and puzzling in terms of structure and movement and scope, The Name of the World is stacked full of magic moments of grace and horror and wonder, all described in language that is, if nothing else, distinctly Johnson’s. That is to say, the novel is perhaps not great but the lines it contains most certainly (sometimes) are. Here is the sentence I went searching for, plus the set-up that comes just before:

Her blouse was sleeveless and her armpits stained with wide blotches of sweat. I made a note to myself — I had to get to a chemist someday, and ask if sweat is the same substance as tears.

If White Noise educated me through its trafficking of negatives and its America of misinformation and misunderstood systems, and Hard Boiled Wonderland taught me the value of a steady narrative hand in treating wild imagination, then The Name of the World opened my eyes to the beauty of imperfection, the simple truth that writing, like reading, is a process, one in which small successes will often find themselves surrounded by larger failures, and that the resulting imperfection, each unique admixture of good and bad, is, in a very real sense, the entire point.


  • Ken

    Is the future of young writers in America now solely in the hands of spoiled white children with little to no insight to suffering? I ask only because, beyond the unclear associations developed in this fluffy piece of pastry I’ve stumbled upon (unclear why it was written, even), I’ve found its indicative of a trend I’ve seen more and more: well-fed young writers such as Beachy, surprised when suffering or difficulty is translated eloquently in prose, and trying their darndest to fix the concept of such things in their own cosmology, a shiny set of hand-me-downs set in reclining chairs overlooking soon-to-be-despoiled vistas. It would appear that an entire generation of young American writers with the privilege of a trust fund and a fine education are now locked in to regurgitate their shallow insights for the next generation of confused rich white children. Vicious cycle.

  • Ken

    Is the future of young writers in America now solely in the hands of spoiled white children with little to no insight to suffering? I ask only because, beyond the unclear associations developed in this fluffy piece of pastry I’ve stumbled upon (unclear why it was written, even), I’ve found its indicative of a trend I’ve seen more and more: well-fed young writers such as Beachy, surprised when suffering or difficulty is translated eloquently in prose, and trying their darndest to fix the concept of such things in their own cosmology, a shiny set of hand-me-downs set in reclining chairs overlooking soon-to-be-despoiled vistas. It would appear that an entire generation of young American writers with the privilege of a trust fund and a fine education are now locked in to regurgitate their shallow insights for the next generation of confused rich white children. Vicious cycle.

  • DH

    I think it’s okay to be rich. I’m not, but I wish I were…just a working class Joe all my life who happens to be literate. But I think the historical record would bear me out that great writers come from all walks of life. It’s true that most aspiring writers don’t end up on Mount Parnassus…just a select few. And they don’t necessarily lead happy lives either, artistic success and personal fulfillment aren’t very well correlated.

    I never met Kyle but it will be a happy day when I do. We have corresponded and he’s the nicest guy. I bet he’s a knockout teacher too. Sounds like one.

  • DH

    I think it’s okay to be rich. I’m not, but I wish I were…just a working class Joe all my life who happens to be literate. But I think the historical record would bear me out that great writers come from all walks of life. It’s true that most aspiring writers don’t end up on Mount Parnassus…just a select few. And they don’t necessarily lead happy lives either, artistic success and personal fulfillment aren’t very well correlated.

    I never met Kyle but it will be a happy day when I do. We have corresponded and he’s the nicest guy. I bet he’s a knockout teacher too. Sounds like one.

  • kyle

    Ken,
    There are a whole lot of young writers in this country, almost all of whom are not me.

    Also this is pretty terribly way to start a dialogue. Though I suppose the question here — plus whatever answers and further questions would follow, the whole possibility of considering this issue of privilege as it pertains to artistic output — isn’t really your point. Vicious cycle indeed.

  • kyle

    Ken,
    There are a whole lot of young writers in this country, almost all of whom are not me.

    Also this is pretty terribly way to start a dialogue. Though I suppose the question here — plus whatever answers and further questions would follow, the whole possibility of considering this issue of privilege as it pertains to artistic output — isn’t really your point. Vicious cycle indeed.

  • kyle

    *terrible*, that is.

    also, DH, i thank you for the kind words.

  • kyle

    *terrible*, that is.

    also, DH, i thank you for the kind words.

  • http://threeguysonebook.com Jason Rice

    Painting everyone with the same brush, isn’t the best way to start a conversation. Are today’s fiction writers educated, white, and rich? I don’t know, for sure. They might be now that they’ve been published. Zadie Smith isn’t any of those things, her husband isn’t either, or Dave Eggers and his wife, or Nicole Krauss, A.M. Homes, too. Zoe Heller is a mom, English, and educated in public schools, and probably the best female writer working today, at least of an age where your comments are pointed Ken. Don Pollock is a regular guy from the back woods, and yes Chris Sorrentino is son of…so, Colson Whitehead isn’t any of those things, working class at best, his fiction, especially his latest, isn’t about anything other than his experiences in a white world. Josh Ferris is a regular guy, father, and great novelist. Bret Easton Ellis, sure, he’s those things, Jay Mac too, doesn’t make them bad, and their not complaining about anything, except for being rich, and how much it sucks to get laid all the time, I guess chocolate cake every night is lame after a while. Anthony Doerr is a family man, novelist and short story writer, and Steve Toltz, he’s a fucking regular guy who wrote a brilliant, amazing novel. Dana Spiotta blew the lid of the literary world with her novel Eat the Document, and Chuck Palahniuk fixed cars for a living while he wrote Fight Club. Mischa Berlinski wrote a great debut and his sister Claire is a wonderful novelist, I don’t think there is anything wrong with them, even if they’re white and went to college. Mark SaFranko is a working guy, regular as rain, and wrote great books, but he’s white, so I guess you’re right Ken. Can you write novels and get past the gate keepers if you don’t have a college education? It might help these days if you were raised in the Baltic states, but as far as education goes, I don’t think it matters, even if you are writing about suffering, or accepting the new climate in America, as a person from another country. Color doesn’t matter, content does, but even then, it must come with a pedigree (platform, readership, prior published work, buzz, hype, and look like something else), and then they’ll pay attention. That’s if they cared about publishing fiction any more. Tom Rachman lived in Rome and is American, and wrote the best novel of last year, and Adam Ross took 12 years to write his masterpiece, but fuck, what did Updike and Cheever and Yates do? Or Muriel Spark? But I’m not trying to convince myself, so.

  • http://threeguysonebook.com Jason Rice

    Painting everyone with the same brush, isn’t the best way to start a conversation. Are today’s fiction writers educated, white, and rich? I don’t know, for sure. They might be now that they’ve been published. Zadie Smith isn’t any of those things, her husband isn’t either, or Dave Eggers and his wife, or Nicole Krauss, A.M. Homes, too. Zoe Heller is a mom, English, and educated in public schools, and probably the best female writer working today, at least of an age where your comments are pointed Ken. Don Pollock is a regular guy from the back woods, and yes Chris Sorrentino is son of…so, Colson Whitehead isn’t any of those things, working class at best, his fiction, especially his latest, isn’t about anything other than his experiences in a white world. Josh Ferris is a regular guy, father, and great novelist. Bret Easton Ellis, sure, he’s those things, Jay Mac too, doesn’t make them bad, and their not complaining about anything, except for being rich, and how much it sucks to get laid all the time, I guess chocolate cake every night is lame after a while. Anthony Doerr is a family man, novelist and short story writer, and Steve Toltz, he’s a fucking regular guy who wrote a brilliant, amazing novel. Dana Spiotta blew the lid of the literary world with her novel Eat the Document, and Chuck Palahniuk fixed cars for a living while he wrote Fight Club. Mischa Berlinski wrote a great debut and his sister Claire is a wonderful novelist, I don’t think there is anything wrong with them, even if they’re white and went to college. Mark SaFranko is a working guy, regular as rain, and wrote great books, but he’s white, so I guess you’re right Ken. Can you write novels and get past the gate keepers if you don’t have a college education? It might help these days if you were raised in the Baltic states, but as far as education goes, I don’t think it matters, even if you are writing about suffering, or accepting the new climate in America, as a person from another country. Color doesn’t matter, content does, but even then, it must come with a pedigree (platform, readership, prior published work, buzz, hype, and look like something else), and then they’ll pay attention. That’s if they cared about publishing fiction any more. Tom Rachman lived in Rome and is American, and wrote the best novel of last year, and Adam Ross took 12 years to write his masterpiece, but fuck, what did Updike and Cheever and Yates do? Or Muriel Spark? But I’m not trying to convince myself, so.

  • http://rgv7735.wordpress.com Robert Vaughan

    I am literally sick over the tone you use Ken. It’s as if you’ve urinated all over this site (projecting quite a lot of your very own ‘vicious cycle,’ that of the self-designated ‘critic.’ Certainly, even if some of your criticisms of Kyle Beachy were accurate, why would you single him out to represent the entire race of “spoiled white children” (of which, actually among these three, he is only white), and assume (like the majority of your pathetic rant) that he has no insight into suffering. How would you know? And what gives you the right to be so presumptuous? Well-fed? Hardly, how many “young” writers devoted to their craft do you know that make a fortune from their first novels? It’s a very small group. How do I know? I’ve lived in that zip code.
    What makes me the most furious is how little you seem to know the reality of most writers. I write (and teach) full time. I am neither young (and Beachy is not as young as you make him sound) and not a trust fund kid (nor is he), and fine education or not, why would that be held against someone, anyone?
    It just so happens that I spent the entire day in one of Kyle’s workshops at Iowa University Summer Writing Program today. What I learned was invaluable, and I find him to be humble, smart, insightful, and direct.
    You might do well to open yourself to a little more education before spewing such negative “critique.” There is nothing more shallow to me, reeking of regurgitation, than self-prophecy.

  • http://rgv7735.wordpress.com Robert Vaughan

    I am literally sick over the tone you use Ken. It’s as if you’ve urinated all over this site (projecting quite a lot of your very own ‘vicious cycle,’ that of the self-designated ‘critic.’ Certainly, even if some of your criticisms of Kyle Beachy were accurate, why would you single him out to represent the entire race of “spoiled white children” (of which, actually among these three, he is only white), and assume (like the majority of your pathetic rant) that he has no insight into suffering. How would you know? And what gives you the right to be so presumptuous? Well-fed? Hardly, how many “young” writers devoted to their craft do you know that make a fortune from their first novels? It’s a very small group. How do I know? I’ve lived in that zip code.
    What makes me the most furious is how little you seem to know the reality of most writers. I write (and teach) full time. I am neither young (and Beachy is not as young as you make him sound) and not a trust fund kid (nor is he), and fine education or not, why would that be held against someone, anyone?
    It just so happens that I spent the entire day in one of Kyle’s workshops at Iowa University Summer Writing Program today. What I learned was invaluable, and I find him to be humble, smart, insightful, and direct.
    You might do well to open yourself to a little more education before spewing such negative “critique.” There is nothing more shallow to me, reeking of regurgitation, than self-prophecy.

  • Ken

    Kyle- If humility and respect are indeed your primary watchwords, then discount my inquiry as to your quality of pedagogy with a grain of salt, and forgive me for the bitterness that naturally binds itself to a life of poverty, wherein education is often sorely lacking and debt is easy-come and near-eternal. I also apologize, Robert, if I “literally” made you ill with my inquiry, as in you stood up from the keyboard vomiting(?), but “methinks the lady doth protest too much”. Clearly you should take this for what it is. This was my knee-jerk reaction to running across a seemingly pointless fluff piece written by what seemed to be one of thousands of skateboarding (or in your case, tennis-playing) “youngish” writer-professors that would appear (the writer’s persona or “face” manifests in their writing, as Orwell said) to have been born with silver spoons in their every available nook and cranny, predestined for countless pithy quotes in collections their friends/students run/review, whose inanity often strikes me as boorish and is indicative of the state of fiction’s pretense-riddled wasteland as I see it in my oh-so-under-educated location on the map. If that isn’t clear, let me put it another way. Regardless of actual class, the “bourgeoisie-bohemian” mentality of certain individuals in our education system speaks to a disturbing class system that I see as stifling and outdated and troublesome, no matter how delicately described to me. Jason, you speak of many successful writers having come from places lacking privilege, and that’s my point. People that work for a living and don’t have Delilo targets on their backs make for the best writers because they live life… whereas writers that double as skateboarders and sip chai on mountain-tops generally call to mind the spoiled rich children of MTV’s Jackass. For my over-generalizations and broad brush-strokes, I apologize, as expressionism doesn’t mix well with impressionism, but I dare say I might have hit a nerve with certain people. Ivory towers, even the faintest notion of them, sicken me, though not literally. Kyle proved restraint and consideration in the face of this shot in the dark, and that’s a fine way to be, regardless of how little I appreciate the idea of a self-perpetuating silver spoon education system set up to exclude the lower class for the sake of… the Iowa writer factory, let’s say. Intellectual inbreeding and fluff doesn’t breed successful writers. It clones itself, each one degenerating further.

  • Ken

    Kyle- If humility and respect are indeed your primary watchwords, then discount my inquiry as to your quality of pedagogy with a grain of salt, and forgive me for the bitterness that naturally binds itself to a life of poverty, wherein education is often sorely lacking and debt is easy-come and near-eternal. I also apologize, Robert, if I “literally” made you ill with my inquiry, as in you stood up from the keyboard vomiting(?), but “methinks the lady doth protest too much”. Clearly you should take this for what it is. This was my knee-jerk reaction to running across a seemingly pointless fluff piece written by what seemed to be one of thousands of skateboarding (or in your case, tennis-playing) “youngish” writer-professors that would appear (the writer’s persona or “face” manifests in their writing, as Orwell said) to have been born with silver spoons in their every available nook and cranny, predestined for countless pithy quotes in collections their friends/students run/review, whose inanity often strikes me as boorish and is indicative of the state of fiction’s pretense-riddled wasteland as I see it in my oh-so-under-educated location on the map. If that isn’t clear, let me put it another way. Regardless of actual class, the “bourgeoisie-bohemian” mentality of certain individuals in our education system speaks to a disturbing class system that I see as stifling and outdated and troublesome, no matter how delicately described to me. Jason, you speak of many successful writers having come from places lacking privilege, and that’s my point. People that work for a living and don’t have Delilo targets on their backs make for the best writers because they live life… whereas writers that double as skateboarders and sip chai on mountain-tops generally call to mind the spoiled rich children of MTV’s Jackass. For my over-generalizations and broad brush-strokes, I apologize, as expressionism doesn’t mix well with impressionism, but I dare say I might have hit a nerve with certain people. Ivory towers, even the faintest notion of them, sicken me, though not literally. Kyle proved restraint and consideration in the face of this shot in the dark, and that’s a fine way to be, regardless of how little I appreciate the idea of a self-perpetuating silver spoon education system set up to exclude the lower class for the sake of… the Iowa writer factory, let’s say. Intellectual inbreeding and fluff doesn’t breed successful writers. It clones itself, each one degenerating further.

  • kyle

    Ken,
    Here’s one surefire way to work around the intellectual inbreeding of the system(s) that’ve excluded you: If you’re a fiction writer, work really goddamned hard on your fiction. Make it really, really good. Sell it to a giant publisher or tiny independent publisher who’ll publish it, or publish it yourself. Blow the American population out of the water with your brand of chiseled honesty that white, young, employed people like myself can’t possibly mimic. Publishing in 2010 is far bigger than Midtown, Ken, and never has it been harder for your villainous systems to quiet voices that run counter their own.

    But a bigger problem might be this: based on what I’ve read above, it’s fairly clear that you’re an asshole. And it’s very, very difficult to write compelling stories if you are incapable of empathy, and fail to establish what Tolstoy called “communion” (the entire purpose of art). Orwell was right, of course.

    Except maybe you’r not a writer, and have come to this website as a reader only. But shit, Ken! The mini-essays are called “When We Fell In Love” and you complain of fluff? You expected plumbing of metaphysical depths? Hard-hitting accounts of American colonialism? It’s a fucking series of fucking essays about the books that inspired us to write. Don’t be an asshole. And again I’ll say it because it works both ways: Publishing in 2010 is far bigger than Midtown. Find writers you like and leave the ivory towers to people who care for them. Maybe this series of essays, maybe this website, isn’t for you. Does someone here really need to show you how to operate a web browser? Look elsewhere! Find shit you like! Enjoy that shit! It’s so easy, Ken!

    And finally, speaking on behalf of skateboarders everywhere, fuck you. What we do — and in fact the reason we continue to do it — is far more difficult than sitting back and spitting anonymous shitstorms of uninformed judgment onto the internet. Skateboarding is about pain and nearly unanimous failure. It’s in fact almost exactly like writing. Or, more specifically, writing well.

    kb

  • kyle

    Ken,
    Here’s one surefire way to work around the intellectual inbreeding of the system(s) that’ve excluded you: If you’re a fiction writer, work really goddamned hard on your fiction. Make it really, really good. Sell it to a giant publisher or tiny independent publisher who’ll publish it, or publish it yourself. Blow the American population out of the water with your brand of chiseled honesty that white, young, employed people like myself can’t possibly mimic. Publishing in 2010 is far bigger than Midtown, Ken, and never has it been harder for your villainous systems to quiet voices that run counter their own.

    But a bigger problem might be this: based on what I’ve read above, it’s fairly clear that you’re an asshole. And it’s very, very difficult to write compelling stories if you are incapable of empathy, and fail to establish what Tolstoy called “communion” (the entire purpose of art). Orwell was right, of course.

    Except maybe you’r not a writer, and have come to this website as a reader only. But shit, Ken! The mini-essays are called “When We Fell In Love” and you complain of fluff? You expected plumbing of metaphysical depths? Hard-hitting accounts of American colonialism? It’s a fucking series of fucking essays about the books that inspired us to write. Don’t be an asshole. And again I’ll say it because it works both ways: Publishing in 2010 is far bigger than Midtown. Find writers you like and leave the ivory towers to people who care for them. Maybe this series of essays, maybe this website, isn’t for you. Does someone here really need to show you how to operate a web browser? Look elsewhere! Find shit you like! Enjoy that shit! It’s so easy, Ken!

    And finally, speaking on behalf of skateboarders everywhere, fuck you. What we do — and in fact the reason we continue to do it — is far more difficult than sitting back and spitting anonymous shitstorms of uninformed judgment onto the internet. Skateboarding is about pain and nearly unanimous failure. It’s in fact almost exactly like writing. Or, more specifically, writing well.

    kb

  • jonathan evison

    . . . here’s the funny thing: based on these posts, it’s ken who sounds like the stuffed shirt who spent too much time in the classroom . . .

  • jonathan evison

    . . . here’s the funny thing: based on these posts, it’s ken who sounds like the stuffed shirt who spent too much time in the classroom . . .